Hromada
Sets the task, adopts legal acts on its own water bodies, and is accountable for the result on its territory. A hromada is Ukraine's amalgamated territorial community, the basic unit of local self-government.
We work with hromadas so that decisions on their own water, land and infrastructure are taken with data in hand. The model was developed with Tsyrkuny hromada in Kharkiv oblast.
The hromada sets the task and adopts the legal acts, the research institution provides the measurement methodology, and the foundation covers what neither of them can. Data comes before decisions: the hromada plans the use of its own natural assets on the basis of measurements.
The classic scheme runs like this: the hromada describes a need, the foundation covers it, both sides move on. That scheme works, and it is where we started. It does not reach decisions: while the foundation delivers generators, the hromada is taking decisions on boreholes, wastewater and dams without environmental data, because the data does not exist.
Sets the task, adopts legal acts on its own water bodies, and is accountable for the result on its territory. A hromada is Ukraine's amalgamated territorial community, the basic unit of local self-government.
Provides the methodology: what to measure, how to assess it, and how to convert measurements into the target indicators of a formal document.
Covers what neither of them can: funding for specific needs, field work, and access to international programmes.
What this produces
In Tsyrkuny the result was operational objective 4.1 of the Hromada Development Strategy to 2030, with nine measurable indicators: hectares of forest to be restored, kilometres of riverbed to be cleared, community monitoring points to be established. These are lines in a document adopted by formal order, not statements of intent.
The network is not assembled on a first-come basis. A hromada has to meet every condition at once, otherwise the model will not start there.
A river, reservoir or wetland already absorbing the consequences of reconstruction, agricultural load, extraction or land release.
While a hromada has no electricity and no water, a conversation about ecosystem monitoring is not possible. The model works at the next step, when the hromada moves from survival to planning.
Someone has to adopt legal acts on the hromada's water bodies. Without that, the data has nowhere to land.
An initiative group, a youth council, local activists: those who will carry on the monitoring once the training ends.
First a letter of intent, then an agreement. We do not count a hromada as a network member on the basis of verbal consent.
The geography of the network, Kharkiv and Kyiv oblasts, covers two different types of pressure on water: a front-line territory with the consequences of hostilities and land release, and a capital agglomeration under heavy anthropogenic load.
As of 07.08.2026 one hromada has confirmed membership of the network, Tsyrkuny. Its participation rests not on a letter of intent but on 22 months of joint work, an order establishing a working group, and an adopted Strategy. The remaining hromadas are in negotiation, and we do not name them until letters of intent are signed: calling a hromada a member before it has confirmed this in writing would misrepresent the hromada itself.
Ready by the time of signing: a proven model, a research partner, and access to international programmes through the ECOPLATFORM FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & GREEN TRANSITION project movement of the Ukrainian Refugees UAPT Social Association.
What this work does not yet have
What exactly we transfer to other hromadas, why a network rather than six separate projects, how we select members, and where the work stands now.
What the hromada lost, what it plans to do by 2030, the foundation's role in that, and what the foundation did not do.