Introduction: why compare aid formats today

A brief overview of aid formats: direct donations, military bonds, and targeted collections

How military bonds work: mechanics, yield, taxation, liquidity

Direct donations: speed, transparency, operational risks, and the role of foundations

Criteria for choosing an aid format: speed, scale, feedback, financial feasibility, tax aspects

Comparing military bonds and donations: pros and cons
Direct donations for operational needs: speed, targeting, evidence
- The fastest path from payment to result thanks to a short decision-making chain and flexible procurement. This allows you to quickly cover the shortage of turnstiles, communications, batteries, spare parts and UAVs when every day counts.
- High targeting and the ability to support units that provide verified requests with specific technical requirements. This enhances the marginal effect of each hryvnia and reduces the risk of aid being diluted.
- Evidence and transparency through public reports, acceptance certificates, invoices, photo and video evidence of delivery to specific teams. This builds trust and allows you to track the path of funds from contribution to use.
-
Lack of financial return and coupon income. Donations are deliberately non-refundable support with a focus on social rather than monetary results.
-
Dependence on the operational capacity of the organization, its logistics, established supply channels, and work with suppliers. Weak processes increase the risk of inefficiency.
-
Delays due to force majeure, market shortages, or price hikes are possible. During peak periods, logistical bottlenecks can slow down sales even if funds are available.
Targeted fees for specific projects: milestone control, community engagement, evidence
- A clearly defined goal and detailed procurement specifications for a specific task (for example, a UAV system for a selected team or medical equipment with certain parameters). This strengthens quality control and compliance with the unit’s expectations.
- High evidence at every stage: from request verification and signing contracts with suppliers to acceptance, testing, and integration. Step-by-step reporting increases trust and manageability of the process.
- The ability to mobilize the community around a specific goal, increasing the communication effect and speed of fundraising. Pooled donor support allows for complex and capital-intensive solutions.
-
Longer implementation cycle due to verification, tendering, manufacturing, logistics, and installation. The total time may exceed the horizons of urgent donors.
-
Dependence on collecting the full amount to start or complete the project, which sometimes causes pauses and restarts of communications.
-
Risk of changes in the unit’s technical requirements or market availability of kits, requiring backup scenarios and flexible re-planning.
Military bonds for budget sustainability: coupon income, return of face value, macro effect
- Support for macro-financial stability of the state and predictability of defense spending. The borrowed funds help to cover cash gaps, plan procurement and maintain budget balance.
- The return of the face value and coupon income is scheduled, which combines civic participation with financial discipline. For investors, it is a way to support the country without losing capital in the longer term.
- Transparency of ownership through the depository system, standardized brokerage procedures and clear terms of issues, which reduces operational risks and increases investor security.
- Market and liquidity risks in case of early sale: the price may deviate from par depending on rates, demand and volatility. This is important to take into account if you may need funds earlier.
- Taxation of coupon income and intermediary commissions reduce the net yield, and the details depend on the broker’s current rules and tariffs.
- Less targeting at the level of a single unit. The effect is manifested systematically, at the level of public finances, and it is more difficult to "see" it as a specific piece of equipment.

When to choose what: typical scenarios
